<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will you pay for The New York Times online?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/will-you-pay-for-the-new-york-times-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/will-you-pay-for-the-new-york-times-online/</link>
	<description>Mainstream media getting new. And social.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Quigley</title>
		<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/will-you-pay-for-the-new-york-times-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Quigley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/?p=796#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>Paul - that is definitely a consequence of doing this. They&#039;ll basically be opting out of the &quot;link economy.&quot; The question is whether a newspaper Web site can survive with far fewer incoming links. Thanks for the comment! - Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8211; that is definitely a consequence of doing this. They&#39;ll basically be opting out of the &#8220;link economy.&#8221; The question is whether a newspaper Web site can survive with far fewer incoming links. Thanks for the comment! &#8211; Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sherk</title>
		<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/will-you-pay-for-the-new-york-times-online/comment-page-1/#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sherk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/?p=796#comment-3011</guid>
		<description>Daniel and Robert, while this doesn&#039;t exactly advance the discussion I thought you might like this joking list I complied of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adamsherk.com/publishing/top-10-reasons-for-new-york-times-paywall/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 10 Reasons The New York Times is Really Putting up a Paywall&lt;/a&gt; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel and Robert, while this doesn&#8217;t exactly advance the discussion I thought you might like this joking list I complied of <a href="http://www.adamsherk.com/publishing/top-10-reasons-for-new-york-times-paywall/" rel="nofollow">Top 10 Reasons The New York Times is Really Putting up a Paywall</a> <img src='http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George F. Snell III</title>
		<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/will-you-pay-for-the-new-york-times-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>George F. Snell III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/?p=796#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>Risky for the NYTimes.  At this stage, I&#039;m not sure readers are willing to shell out money for articles they have been getting for free for many years.  But until I hear what the plan is - I&#039;ll keep an open mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Risky for the NYTimes.  At this stage, I&#39;m not sure readers are willing to shell out money for articles they have been getting for free for many years.  But until I hear what the plan is &#8211; I&#39;ll keep an open mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/will-you-pay-for-the-new-york-times-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/?p=796#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by MediaTricks: New post: Will you pay for The New York Times online? http://bit.ly/5PHcGS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by MediaTricks: New post: Will you pay for The New York Times online? <a href="http://bit.ly/5PHcGS.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5PHcGS..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulbalcerak</title>
		<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/will-you-pay-for-the-new-york-times-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>paulbalcerak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/?p=796#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Not only will I not pay for access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://NYTimes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;, I&#039;ll actively avoid linking to them. Principle and everything aside, what good am I doing anyone by linking to the New York Times when X percent of them have already hit their monthly limit? I may as well seek out similar content elsewhere, which is open and free for everyone to view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only will I not pay for access to <a href="http://NYTimes.com" rel="nofollow">NYTimes.com</a>, I&#39;ll actively avoid linking to them. Principle and everything aside, what good am I doing anyone by linking to the New York Times when X percent of them have already hit their monthly limit? I may as well seek out similar content elsewhere, which is open and free for everyone to view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

