<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Old Media, New Tricks &#187; Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/category/metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com</link>
	<description>Mainstream media getting new. And social.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:26:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New tricks: Know your audience &#8211; whether you&#8217;re on Twitter or in print</title>
		<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/new-tricks-know-your-audience-whether-youre-on-twitter-or-in-print/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/new-tricks-know-your-audience-whether-youre-on-twitter-or-in-print/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Quigley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently started writing a social media newsletter for the Austin American-Statesman&#8217;s newsroom. I posted the first one, which was about responding to readers, here. Here&#8217;s the second one, edited slightly to make sense as a blog post. Got a great question last week from a staff member: &#8220;This may sound like trivia&#8230;. but, I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently started writing a social media newsletter for the Austin American-Statesman&#8217;s newsroom. I posted the first one, which was about responding to readers, <a href="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/new-tricks-responding-to-readers/" target="_blank">here</a>. Here&#8217;s the second one, edited slightly to make sense as a blog post.</p>
<hr />
<p>Got a great question last week from a staff member:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This may sound like trivia&#8230;. but, I&#8217;m wondering what posting on Facebook has received the most comments? People are always asking me&#8230;. what should they post to get a lot of responses?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not trivial at all. The answer is a bit nuanced, though, so stay with me:</p>
<p>Readers, of course, are all different and they consume their news in various ways. Based on my experience, however, I can stereotype them some based on the metrics we&#8217;ve seen:</p>
<p>* <strong>Print readers. </strong>They have some time to read in-depth stories and are looking for good investigative journalism and longer-form stories.</p>
<p>* <strong>Newspaper Web site readers.</strong> In general, they are interested intensely in local news (and Longhorns sports), and will click in droves on juicy crime stories. A lot of these readers come from the search engines to our site (not through the front page). On most days, the majority of the most-read news stories on statesman.com are crime-related.</p>
<p>* <strong>Social media consumers. </strong>They are not as interested in the juicy crime stories as our average online reader. Several times, we&#8217;ve had crime stories that were pulling in big-time traffic online. However, when I&#8217;ve posted on Twitter and Facebook, those stories would flop. Instead, these consumers are seeking immediate-impact news that affects them personally. Since social media is a two-way communication tool, I&#8217;ve heard about it, too. Often, the only public responses I&#8217;ve received are, &#8220;Why do I need to know about that poor kid&#8217;s murder? Stop being sensational.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why the different responses based on medium? I think it&#8217;s because people who use social media began and maintained using the services because their friends and family are there. Social media is more &#8220;me centric&#8221; than the rest of the Web. They hang out on Facebook and share things that impact their own lives, such as their kid losing a tooth or the latest cute pics of their dog. Journalists who are pushing news are invading that territory. We&#8217;re welcomed as friends if we&#8217;re playing along &#8211; giving them news that is immediately useful to them. We&#8217;re annoying intruders if we don&#8217;t realize that&#8217;s what they want.</p>
<p>The staff member had asked about the comments, and I&#8217;m not dodging that &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen that the social media posts with the most comments also are the ones that are read the most, so they go hand-in-hand.</p>
<p><strong> My advice: </strong>When you post on Facebook or Twitter about your beat, you should be sharing stuff that you&#8217;d otherwise share with friends (even if you didn&#8217;t work here).</p>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/robquig" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Robert Quigley</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/new-tricks-know-your-audience-whether-youre-on-twitter-or-in-print/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

