<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Old Media, New Tricks &#187; google wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/category/google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com</link>
	<description>Mainstream media getting new. And social.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:26:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Wave news community</title>
		<link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/google-wave-news-community/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/google-wave-news-community/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Quigley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert quigley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are one of the lucky few who scored a Google Wave account, you&#8217;ve probably logged in, fumbled around a bit, probably were impressed by the instant nature of it — and you probably got annoyed relatively quickly at Wave&#8217;s slowness. If you have enough friends or colleagues who have invites, you might have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are one of the lucky few who scored a Google Wave account, you&#8217;ve probably logged in, fumbled around a bit, probably were impressed by the instant nature of it — and you probably got annoyed relatively quickly at Wave&#8217;s slowness. If you have enough friends or colleagues who have invites, you might have gotten a peek at Wave&#8217;s potential as a collaboration tool.</p>
<p>For journalists, collaboration with the public on news events is the (Google) wave of the future. I <a rel="nofollow" href="http://mediabullseye.com/mb/2009/10/riding-google-waves-potential.html" target="_blank">wrote about Wave&#8217;s potential for journalism</a> for Media Bullseye. If you don&#8217;t know what Wave is, here&#8217;s <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.austin360.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/digitalsavant/entries/2009/10/13/people_are_stil.html" target="_blank">a good blog post that explains Wave,</a> written by Omar Gallaga, a colleague of mine at the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://statesman.com" target="_blank">Statesman</a>.</p>
<p>Having played around with Wave quite a bit, I was ready Tuesday to experiment a bit with Wave&#8217;s potential to report and discuss the news. So, I set up a new wave, called it &#8220;Austin News&#8221;, put out some ground rules and then <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/statesman/status/5394893538" target="_blank">publicized my experiment through Twitter.</a> Within a few hours, we had more than 100 people talking (mostly) about local news in the wave.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/picture-10.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-723" title="picture-10" src="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/picture-10.png" alt="" width="455" height="414" /></a></p>
<p>I even embedded a poll to let people say whether they planned to vote on Election Day. Someone went in and edited my poll question to add &#8220;or have already voted&#8221; since the polls had been opened for a few hours by then:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/picture-11.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-724" title="picture-11" src="http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/picture-11.png" alt="" width="400" height="409" /></a></p>
<p>In five hours, the Austin News wave generated about 70 individual comments, or &#8220;wavelets.&#8221; The wave overall was a bit slow, somewhat hard to follow and a little buggy. (I couldn&#8217;t get a photo to appear, and I think it is because I tried to upload too large of a photo, clogging the system.)</p>
<p>I did, however, see some great discussion; I posted a link to the Texas constitutional amendments that are up for a vote, and people immediately began discussing why anyone should care about them, which are the the most important ones and why. I dropped in topics a few times throughout the day, from the election to the launch of the <a href="http://texastribune.org">Texas Tribune</a> to some local economic news. I included links to our stories. People discussed each item as they came in.</p>
<p>There is potential here.</p>
<p>Waves get overloaded after about 50 wavelets, or messages, are added to a particular wave. I&#8217;m going to launch another wave tomorrow (a daily edition of waves, of sorts) to keep them from getting too overloaded. I imagine Google will speed this system up quite a bit before opening it up to the public.</p>
<p>It was the first of many experiments on Wave. I&#8217;m excited to see where it leads.</p>
<p>- <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/robquig" target="_blank">Robert Quigley</a><br />
________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p><em>If you have any questions, ideas or suggestions, please leave them as comments below!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/google-wave-news-community/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

